Tag Archives: Cultivar

Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ – Officially Registered!

Sarracenia 'Leah Wilkerson' x 'Adrian Slack'Sarracenia ‘Legacy’

Carnivorous Plant Newsletter – March 2015

Today I received my copy of the March 2015 Carnivorous Plant newsletter! YAY! If you haven’t already done so, become a member of the International Carnivorous Plant Society to get your copy of quarterly carnivorous plant newsletter goodness. In this issue, a plant that I hold near and dear to me has been registered and published. Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ is now an official cultivar! I can not take the credit for this plant though. This was a cross that was done by Brooks Garcia, and I grew S. ‘Legacy’ out from that 2008 seed batch. (Brooks, thank you so much for sharing your creativity and passion with the world!) Something brilliant was bound to come out of the combined bloodline of S. ‘Leah Wilkerson’ x ‘Adrian Slack’. I’m thankful that I was fortunate enough to receive the seed that this plant came out of. This is the first plant that I’ve submitted and registered. Although my purpose of growing these plants is to enjoy them, I am hoping that some of my own creations would produce cultivar quality plants. And who knows, maybe some of those will be registered in the future. (Note: see past post The Name Game.)

Below is the description that is published in this issue of the CPN. The description can also be viewed on the International Carnivorous Plant Society website:
http://www.carnivorousplants.org/cpn/Species/v44n1p32_38.html#legacy

***

Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ – published in the International Carnivorous Plant Newsletter – March 2015 issue.

Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ – back cover

Sarracenia ‘Legacy’
Submitted: 24 September 2014

Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ is a cross of S. ‘Leah Wilkerson’ × S. ‘Adrian Slack’ produced by Brooks Garcia in 2008, which I grew out from seed. Out of a very small handful of seeds that Brooks sent to me that year, I was only able to germinate two seedlings. Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ was the only plant to survive and grow from that particular batch.

I coined the name Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ in 2012. The word “legacy” refers to a gift, or something of value passed on from one generation to another. The name is derived from a combination of factors. Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ commemorates the individuals the parent plants are named after, as well as their work with the furtherance and cultivation of this majestic genus. “Legacy” also pays homage to the influence that the parent plants have, and will continue to have on Sarracenia cultivation for generations to come. On a more personal note, the name also pays tribute to those who have inspired me in my botanical endeavors. I am deeply thankful for the botanical passion, vision, and drive that has been passed into my life by so many wonderful individuals.

Young pitchers start off predominantly greenish, with traces of white in the upper portion. As pitchers mature under intense light, the white top portion of the pitcher intensifies and spreads, and a strong prominent dark red splotch develops in the throat. These features have been stable in both outdoor and greenhouse conditions. The pitchers of Sarracenia ‘Legacy’ typically attain a height of 60-75 cm however larger pitchers have been observed. Blooms are yellowish-cream with light hints of pink on the sepals. This plant should be reproduced only by vegetative means to ensure that its unique characteristics are maintained.

The Name Game

The Name Game! You know, >The Name Game!<
Sarracenia Sarracenia bo-barracenia,
banana-fana-fo-farracenia,
fe-fy-mo marracenia… SARRACENIA! 

With all of the combinations of plants and seemingly infinite breeding possibilities, things can get a little crazy when it comes to names. There are official cultivars, and then there are unofficial names. It’s one hectic name game. I realized that I’ve been blogging all this time using all these funky names and punctuations without going over basics.  My bad. I hope this post helps clarify some of the cryptic punctuation and algebraic-like notations I’ve been using. Let’s review.

Mom-x-Dad

You see me use plant A x plant B quite a bit. The mother plant is listed first. (Remember, ladies first!) This is the plant that bears the fruit and produces the seed. The daddy plant is the one that’s the pollen donor. The mother plant is listed before the x, and the pollen parent is listed after the “x.” You may ask, “Oh but isn’t A x B the same as B x A?”  Well… not really. Using one plant as the mother plant can yield some different results compared to the reciprocal cross. Yes, there are similarities between the offspring of both crosses, but it has been observed that the pod parent (mother) carries a little stronger influence on the progeny.

Then there’s the whole thing of the (parenthesis) that are used in hybrid/cross notation. Things can get pretty complex when it comes to multiple plants in the parentage, so the parenthesis are employed to keep track of what makes up what. After all, the parent plants on either side of the “x” can consist of a combination of many other plants.

Now, if there’s a plant that someone feels is pretty badass, they may choose to recognize this fabulousness and give it a name. The name could be a working name for their own personal records and/or pleasure, or the individual/s could go through the trouble and establish it as an official cultivar in line with the cultivar code.*

cultivar

The word “cultivar” is a portmanteau (a combination of two or more words) and is derived from the words “cultivated” and “variety.” “Cultivar” is defined in the eighth edition of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants under article 2.3 as “…an assemblage of plants that (a) has been selected for a particular character or combination of characters,  (b) is distinct, uniform, and stable in these characters, and (c) when propagated by appropriate means, retains those characters…”

Status

I bet some of you probably wondered, “Yooo, what up with the single quotes and double quotes?”  When indicating that something is a cultivar, use single quotes. (Take a look at some official Sarracenia cultivars here.) Check out Article 14.1 in the eighth edition of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants:

“Cultivar status is indicated by enclosing the cultivar epithet within single quotation marks. Double quotation marks and the abbreviations cv. and var are not to be used within a name to distinguish cultivar epithets; such use is to be corrected.”

On a final note regarding registering cultivars, I like how Barry Rice put it:

“Mind you, just because you have a lovely and wonderful plant, it is not necessarily worth registering as a cultivar. I have never met a Sarracenia I didn’t like, but hardly any qualify in my mind as being cultivars! I think that cultivar names should be reserved for plants that are really special.” 

“Really special” is something that opens up a whole ‘nother topic for discussion and passionate debate. Personally I haven’t submitted any plants for cultivar status. Not yet at least! There are a couple plants in the pipeline now that are promising – but things like this take time to properly evaluate. I hope to be able to register a few plants in the future.


*The latest and greatest version of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants could be found by doing some web searching. You may buy the code, but if you look carefully enough, you’ll see some websites that you can actually download it from. It’s a hefty 206 page document that makes for some exciting reading material.